Skip to main content
Log in

Expand the Shares Together: Envy-Free Mechanisms with a Small Number of Cuts

  • Published:
Algorithmica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We study the problem of fair division of a heterogeneous resource among strategic players. Given a divisible heterogeneous cake, we wish to divide the cake among n players to meet these conditions: (I) every player (weakly) prefers his allocated cake to any other player’s share (such notion is known as envy-freeness), (II) the allocation is dominant strategy-proof (truthful) (III) the number of cuts made on the cake is small. We provide methods for dividing the cake under different assumptions on the valuation functions of the players. First, we suppose that the valuation function of every player is a single interval with a special property, namely ordering property. For this case, we propose a process called expansion process and show that it results in an envy-free and truthful allocation that cuts the cake into exactly n pieces. Next, we remove the ordering restriction and show that for this case, an extended form of the expansion process, called expansion process with unlocking yields an envy-free allocation of the cake with at most \(2(n-1)\) cuts. Furthermore, we show that in the expansion process with unlocking, the players may misrepresent their valuations to earn more share. In addition, we use a more complex form of the expansion process with unlocking to obtain an envy-free and truthful allocation that cuts the cake in at most \(2(n-1)\) locations. We also, evaluate our expansion method in practice. In the empirical results, we compare the number of cuts made by our method to the number of cuts in the optimal solution (\(n-1\)). The experiments reveal that the number of cuts made by the expansion and unlocking process for envy-free division of the cake is very close to the optimal solution. Finally, we study piecewise constant and piecewise uniform valuation functions with m pieces and present the conditions, under which a generalized form of expansion process can allocate the cake via O(nm) cuts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Group strategy-proof means no group of players can misreport their valuations, such that in the resulting allocation all of them earn more payoff.

References

  1. Alijani, R., Farhadi, M., Ghodsi, M., Seddighin, M., Tajik, A.S.: Envy-free mechanisms with minimum number of cuts. In: Thirty-First AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2017)

  2. Aziz, H., Mackenzie, S.: A discrete and bounded envy-free cake cutting protocol for any number of agents. In: 2016 IEEE 57th Annual Symposium onFoundations of Computer Science (FOCS), pp. 416–427. IEEE (2016)

  3. Aziz, H., Ye, C.: Cake cutting algorithms for piecewise constant and piecewise uniform valuations. In: International Conference on Web and Internet Economics, pp. 1–14. Springer (2014)

  4. Barbanel, J.B., Brams, S.J.: Cake division with minimal cuts: envy-free procedures for three persons, four persons, and beyond. Math. Soc. Sci. 48, 251–269 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Bei, X., Chen, N., Hua, X., Tao, B., Yang, E.: Optimal proportional cake cutting with connected pieces. In: Twenty-sixth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2012)

  6. Bei, X., Chen, N., Huzhang, G., Tao, B., Wu, J.: Cake cutting: envy and truth. In: Twenty-sixth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 3625–3631. AAAI Press (2017)

  7. Brams, S.J., Feldman, M., Lai, J.K., Morgenstern, J., Procaccia, A.D.: On maxsum fair cake divisions. In: Twenty-sixth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2012)

  8. Brams, S.J., Jones, M.A., Klamler, C.: Better ways to cut a cake. Not. AMS 53, 1314–1321 (2006)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Brams, S.J., Taylor, A.D.: An envy-free cake division protocol. Am. Math. Mon. 102, 9–18 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Caragiannis, I., Lai, J.K., Procaccia, A.D.: Towards more expressive cake cutting. IJCAI Proc. Int. Jt. Conf. Artif. Intell. 22, 127 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chen, Y., Lai, J.K., Parkes, D.C., Procaccia, A.D.: Truth, justice, and cake cutting. Games Econ. Beh. 77, 284–297 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Deng, X., Qi, Q., Saberi, A.: Algorithmic solutions for envy-free cake cutting. Oper. Res. 60, 1461–1476 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Kurokawa, D., Lai, J.K., Procaccia, A.D.: How to cut a cake before the party ends. In: Twenty-Seventh AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2013)

  14. Maya, A., Nisan, N.: Incentive compatible two player cake cutting. In: International Workshop on Internet and Network Economics, pp. 170–183. Springer (2012)

  15. Procaccia, A.D.: Cake cutting: not just child’s play. Commun. ACM 56, 78–87 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Procaccia, A.D.: Cake cutting algorithms. In: Handbook of Computational Social Choice, chapter 13, Citeseer (2015)

  17. Steinhaus, H.: The problem of fair division. Econometrica 16, 101–104 (1948)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Stromquist, W.: How to cut a cake fairly. Am. Math. Mon. 87, 640–644 (1980)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Stromquist, W.: Envy-free cake divisions cannot be found by finite protocols. Electr. J. Comb. 15, 11 (2008)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masoud Seddighin.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

A preliminary version of this paper is appeared in AAAI 2017 [1].

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Seddighin, M., Farhadi, M., Ghodsi, M. et al. Expand the Shares Together: Envy-Free Mechanisms with a Small Number of Cuts. Algorithmica 81, 1728–1755 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00453-018-0500-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00453-018-0500-z

Keywords

Navigation